The Nigeria Police Force has issued a firm response to recent criticisms from the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) regarding its Motor Vehicle Tinted Glass Permit Policy, emphasizing that the regulation remains in effect pending a final court ruling. In a detailed statement released on Tuesday, the Force insisted that no court order restrained it from enforcing it and defended the policy as essential for public safety and crime prevention, while reaffirming its respect for the judiciary.
The controversy stems from ongoing public discussions, sparked by a statement from the NBA President, Afam Osigwe, SAN, which questioned the policy’s legality amid pending litigation. The police, however, clarified that no court has yet declared the policy unlawful or issued a permanent restraining order.
“The existence of pending litigation does not, in itself, extinguish the lawful responsibilities of the Police,” the statement read, underscoring that the Force operates under constitutional mandates to maintain internal security.
Inspector-General of Police, through Force Public Relations Officer CSP Benjamin Hundeyin, reiterated the Force commitment to complying with valid court orders. “The Nigeria Police Force remains unwavering in its respect for the judiciary,” Hundeyin stated, adding that representations made in court were in good faith and reflected the Force’s position. He noted that the police have exercised restraint during the judicial process but warned against misconstruing this as a waiver of authority, especially on matters affecting public safety.
The policy, aimed at regulating heavily tinted vehicle windows, is linked to combating crimes such as kidnapping and armed robbery. “Both globally and within Nigeria, the misuse of heavily tinted vehicles has been associated with serious crimes,” the statement explained, positioning the regulation as a proportionate response to national security threats.
Addressing a recent administrative communication dated December 15, the Force clarified it was for internal planning and public awareness, not an order for immediate enforcement. Operational decisions on timing and methods remain within police discretion, subject to judicial oversight.
Hundeyin also addressed concerns about officer misconduct, affirming a zero-tolerance policy toward extortion, harassment, or abuse. “Any officer found to have engaged in such conduct will be subjected to appropriate disciplinary measures,” he assured, while cautioning against generalizing isolated incidents to tarnish the entire Force. He highlighted the sacrifices of thousands of officers who risk their lives daily to protect citizens.
The statement praised the NBA as a key stakeholder in the justice sector and called for constructive engagement based on mutual respect. “The Force will continue to engage responsibly with all stakeholders, while refraining from public exchanges that may undermine trust in law enforcement or the judiciary,” it said.
In closing, the police urged the public to remain calm and cooperate in shared efforts for safety. This marks the Force’s final position on the matter until the court’s determination, amid growing debates on balancing security measures with citizens’ rights.
